Individualization of training – are you doing it right?

You are probably familiar with the ‘individualization principle’ in training theory that says that training should be individualized? The only problem is that most books/sources don’t necessarily go into how to do it.

The most common solution is to prescribe ‘relative intensity’, like %MAS, %1RM, %VO2max, %HRmax and so on. Using this method we usually ‘individualize’ training intensity. Less often we individualize volume – we tend to do 3×3′ @ 100% MAS, 5×5 @75% 1RM, 30min @75% HRmax. As you have probably noticed, the volume prescription is universal.

Besides, even if we individualize the intensity and volume of training load prescription we also need to do it for the recovery and frequency. And even if we manage to do this, we miss something crucial.There is something we overlook and I cover that in the video.

Besides discussing theory of training individualization by giving race car analogy, I also show how to use MAS table that you can receive by subscribing to our newsletter/mailing list. If you haven’t done it yet please do it in the box below:


The video last 50minutes and I cover different ways to estimate MAS, COD time and how that affects MAS estimation when done in shuttle arrangement and how to prescribe running distances for the group. I also cover my opinion regarding descriptive/benchmark tests and prescriptive/diagnostic tests and how to understand running-based performance in a game using a simple race car analogy.

Enjoy the video.

Related Articles

What is „harder“? –help needed

I am working on an annual plan that quantifies the training impulses (or training load) for most of the training methods (strength, specific conditioning using SSG and running-based conditioning) based on the intensity, volume and density of certain method. For example, strength training impulse is %1RM * volume (reps) * frequency. So, if you lift 3×5 (15) with 80%…

On Individualization

In the video below, I am using framework outlined in Three Different Aspects of Training Load Monitoring and provide some thoughts on individualization, especially the fact that individualization can and should be applied on multiple scales, and just because you are using relative training intensities (e.g. %1RM, %MAS) or relative training load (e.g. volume of running expressed as…


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cancel Membership

Please note that your subscription and membership will be canceled within 24h once we receive your request.