How to Visualize Test Change Scores for Coaches

Introduction

Coaches are not interested in making inferences to a population, statistical significance, nor mean values (P<0.01). What they are interested are individual athletes, their reactions to training and what are practically significant and meaningful changes.

Before proceeding reading this how-to blog post, I urge readers to read the following two presentations from Will Hopkins

If you have read those must read presentations then we can continue. If you haven’t please do.

To evaluate change (is it practically meaningful) we are going to use SWC (Smallest Worthwhile Change) and TE (Typical Error). If you don’t know what they are and how they are used then you haven’t read the mentioned Will Hopkin’s presentations.

Knowing SWC and TE for a test and/or individual (in this case test) we can use NOVEL way of visualizing test change score for the reports so that coaches can understand and see individual players reaction and whether it practically meaningful

Calcuating Typical Error for the test/estimate

I beleive in in-house research, at least doing something simple as this. Knowing typical error (TE) for the test/estimate is of great importance to judge the real change.

What does this mean in real world? It means that if we test a player in vertical jump one day when he was fully rested, and then we re-test him couple of days after in same conditionins (with the assumption that there are no learning effects nor improvement happening; that’s why it is important to do familiarization with the test first) the scores might differ a little. This might be due measurement error and/or biological variability.

Then if we test that same player couple of months later to see the effects of training, how certain are we that the change is real? Here comes TE to help out as you will see later in the visualization and calculus of harmful/trivial/beneficial changes.

Related Articles

Velocity-Based Training: Signal vs. Noise

This is a R workbook using my older bench press data, in which I want to discuss Signal vs. Noise of Velocity-Based Training (VBT) measurements. This could be used for future reliability studies. The goal is to compare within-individual variations of velocity over load-velocity relationship (noise) with smallest practical velocity difference (in my opinion difference in velocities across nRM,…

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cancel Membership

Please note that your subscription and membership will be canceled within 24h once we receive your request.